Caroline's first photograph taken during the field trip. Her snack bag perched in the front seat ready for the field trip. |
One of the things that we have been trying to wrap our head around is the intersubjectivity of the Kindergarten when we reference Richmond. What does Richmond mean for each child in our learning community? What do they see in their mind when we ask questions regarding Richmond?
As we reviewed the project circle transcripts and the student representations of the city we began to realize that each child had their personal reference points and anchors to which they viewed the rest of the city. Elina viewed the city from Rocketts Landing (her home), Reed initially viewed the city from an apartment house near the river, Miles talked often about the yogurt shops in Carytown and Carter considered Richmond Ballet (sister takes ballet) his anchor.
Anna posted a blog last week that has helped us frame some of the work that the Kindergarten has done this year. Anna's blog
But really, until people know a place very, very well, the image we have in our heads is more like a collage than a map, with some very developed areas and some other kind of hazy spots. There may be some accurate routes and connections between places, combined with distortions of distances and errors in relationships between landmarks. Additionally, some of the knowledge may be represented in our heads in a maplike way, but that is combined with all sorts of other sensory information, impressions, bits of memory and even stories.
Anna's research and thinking made sense to me. I remember when I learned to drive in my small hometown. I referenced my mental map ---doing well most of the time but then entering areas that I would refer to as my Bermuda Triangle. They were the hazy parts of my collage.
Our field trips into the city generated stories and impressions that serve as beacons for the Kindergarten. Old and New City Hall, the Governor's Mansion and the train station are landmarks that seemed to appeal to the majority of the students.
We also shared the stories and memories of community member's beacons thinking that others might find them interesting and attach meaning as well.
These beacons included Nathan's tower signalling that he has returned to his home in the Museum District and the Mellow Mushroom serving delectable dishes and of course the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts.
We decided to venture into the neighborhoods referenced including the Museum District, Carytown and one landmark that was not in the city (the airport).
Gabriel noticed a mail delivery truck. We had not labeled mail as a necessary system in the city but Gabriel did think they were community helpers. |
The children used these signs to cross the street and stay safe. |
We often discussed the sidewalks and who built them. What a stroke of luck that Joe and Binford happened to be fixing the sidewalks during our field trip. |
There were signs galore. The Kindergarten blended
each sound in the word and then debated the meaning.
G. found ways to have fun as a child in the city. |
N. has a great tree swing right outside his house. The children were impressed that he could play and live in the city. |
This was a nice sign welcoming people. |
We stumbled on a large store with dryers and washing machines. They were not for sale and people were using them to wash their clothes. One of the children said that it was a laundromat. |
Nathan showed us a small grocery store in his neighborhood where he buys candy. |
We realized that kids living in the city could buy food at this store to cook and eat at home. |
Sabine was one of our primary student photographers and documentors. |
The Virginia Museum of Fine Arts is an anchor for many of the Kindergartners. It might be described as the gateway to the Museum District. |
We had many opportunities for play outside the museum. |
Carytown also had places to play and challenge our bodies. This type of fun is necessary for people in a city. |
We found more fun on the street with World of Mirth's silly mirror. |
A short session for meditating is a must. The Kindergartners found a spot to be mindful. |
The children noticed many signs posted on their walk. |
Garbage cans to keep the city clean. |
We did discover dog poop. This is not a good thing when you are hoping to sit with your friends and eat your snack. |
This does not seem like a very friendly sign. |
One of other point of inquiry was the distance that spans from downtown to the airport. Our discussion one day became a heated debate and we thought we should investigate. We also traveled from R.'s home in the city to the airport . We wondering about the distance from the city to the airport. R thought it took one minute to arrive at the airport from his house.
El: I live in the city and I have to get out of the city. It takes one or two minutes.
Co: I have been to the airport there a thousand times. It took me seventeen minutes to get there from my old house.
The children realized that the journey from the city to the airport is longer than they expected. It is definitely a landmark that is not in the city.
We continue to unpack the field trip. It is very difficult to reach intersubjectivity but we are beginning to see the children make connections. We continue to ask the children to represent their understanding of the city and peel back the layers. Peeking out from underneath each layer are feelings of joy----the children seem to find joy in all parts of the city.